The concept of what "God" may be determines on who you ask.
Ask a Christian, and it gets confusing as some may claim Jesus Christ is God incarnate, some will claim
he's its child - serving as something that's parallel to God itself. A prophet, a separate being etc.
Judaism and Islam have a similar view on God - a single entity often communicating through prophets,
Main ones being Moses and Muhammed.
There are other notable religions with separate beliefs of what God is -
such as Buddhism, Hinduism, and more whom don't hold a view of God as something that's immortal
or necessarily unreachable, but rather as symbolism and admiration.
The amount of religions that exist, existed and will might as well be countless.
But all hold a common sense of what their idea of God is - something that's either reachable,
touchable, its status may be altered if changed in what it holds meaning for,
and is necessary to be given a form or description in terms that are accessible
to us mortal beings - such as a purpose or form/embodiment.
But that can't be - what kind of God is tinted by an essence that's describable, comparable to a mortal's flesh and blood being?
Such God cannot be truly one, superior and beyond anything.
Matter of fact, God can't really be a thing anyway -
It gets complicated when trying to put into words the unfathomable.
So, what is the point of all of this? Is this some text meant to ingrain Atheism, or something of that sort?
Well, no - not exactly. The purpose of this writing isn't to say "God isn't real"
- What I may believe in I will, and I'm not looking to rebel against the idea,
And shaken the delusion out of believers till they no longer do.
My intention is to present a concept. It's quite simple really, and not as exciting as some may expect -
But if I had to say what in my opinion God could be - The answer would be that it is Time itself.
Think about is; Time is independent, beyond anything we know - The Living, Earth, The Milky-Way, The Universe itself really - Time is not subjected to anything, not even existence itself.
Because even in an instance where existence has truly ceased to be whatsoever, Time won't vanish -
It would simply no longer be perceived, brought to essence into reality as we know it.
Time cannot be put into form, truly described as its own thing - it just is.
Since when has it been, and how much longer? Well that creates a paradox -
As Time itself cannot be subject to Time, or can it - creating a self sustaining utterly independent essence?
(It's 4:04 AM, I don't know if I'm cooking or just engaging in text pollution)
In summary; Time might as well be what we choose to refer to as God.
Does that matter? No absolutely not, but it's an interesting concept to think about.
14-08-2026 4:08 AM
Please note that while I present ideas and opinions, mistakes may still occur - whether it's in spelling, wording, or plain fact.